🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an celebration that started out as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate functions where African descendants are paid to talk to white audiences about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The wave has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since those days, placing less emphasis on the accounts of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the celebration is celebrated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it develops is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to rethink Black History Month more than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we witnessed the largest far-right rally in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels emboldened to state that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, far-right parties are expanding in Europe as a entirety.

In the America, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to remove African American heritage and legacy from the records is in progress. One of the former president's first executive orders aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the month represents how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the situation of the contemporary world. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. A university professor, a prof at an educational institution, put it best when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a urge to just do away with events including Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an period that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an framework that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed through the year (as various establishments are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a era that does not avoid political issues, and leaves space for people, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What value has simple recognition of the history when it fails to address the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Institutions who celebrate it should not be pacified with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and alertness to subtle slights, but challenged by the dangers that impact society if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and adaptive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.